O
Laredo
← Community
Public Safetydeclining community discussion

Flock Safety Cameras and Real-Time Crime Center Expansion

Laredo

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0
Importance
40

Declining — less community discussion. 0 comments in the last 30 days.

Public comments (6)

OpposedMaximiliano PradoJun 15, 2026

Spoke on behalf of the Laredo Immigrant Alliance opposing FLOC and Motorola license plate readers, citing extensive database searches without probable cause.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:12:14 →
ConcernedTommyJun 15, 2026

A former DOJ technologist and security researcher noted cybersecurity vulnerabilities, open-access risks, and lack of multi-factor authentication in camera systems.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:57:42 →
OpposedElizabeth SalasadJun 15, 2026

Argued against surveillance expansion, stating that citizens did not consent to mass data collection disguised as public safety.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:33:12 →
OpposedAmadol Flores IIIJun 15, 2026

Urged the city to terminate contracts with Flock Safety due to documented security breaches, data exposure, and misuse by law enforcement.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:37:11 →
OpposedRosa MayaJun 15, 2026

Demanded the city sever ties with Flock systems, citing studies showing surveillance cameras have no statistical effect on crime rates.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:42:59 →
OpposedKaren MunozJun 15, 2026

A policy attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center opposed automated license plate readers, highlighting data sharing with immigration enforcement agencies.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:46:49 →